http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33861
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
--- Comment #2 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-22 14:32 ---
the testcase is valid. [14.3.2]/2 essentially gives it as an example. A
literal '&' is optional in this case (para 1).
para 5 tells us that array to pointer decay happens here, and GCC internally
represents that as
--- Comment #1 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-22 14:13 ---
Fixing bug 30161 might fix, or at least simplify, this too. But I suspect this
name still shows up in error messages where it is suboptimal.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
