https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96989
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
Created attachment 49233
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49233&action=edit
d tree printer
Very minimal tree printing support just to cover SSA_NAME and MEM_REF nodes.
I'm not entirely con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96989
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
The MEM_REF formatting done by the C and C++ pretty-printers is very basic and
doesn't always result in useful output (usually in the most interesting cases).
I posted a patch some time ago to improve it for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96989
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I guess an actual example is still helpful
After spending a few hours away and looking back, it looks like it only happens
when using any example related to pr965
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
