https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
I have my suspicions that the following code will throw an unaligned access
error as well.
shared int var;
void main() {
synchronized { var = 1; }
}
As synchronized statements are lowered t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90065
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
