https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
--- Comment #8 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sun Dec 9 19:55:54 2018
New Revision: 266933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Generate and scan documentation output in Ddoc tests.
The t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
>
>> However, there's another option: C11, 6.4.2.1 Gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
[...]
> I'm not sure given them an encoded mangle in similar vain to Go would be a
> desirable direction, so better off relegating the tests.
Fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> > --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
> > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> >>
> >> The problem obviously is that the native assemblers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> However, there's another option: C11, 6.4.2.1 General, n.71 suggests
>
> On systems in which linkers cannot accept extended
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>>
>> The problem obviously is that the native assemblers don't support UTF-8 in
>> identifiers (and I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>
> The problem obviously is that the native assemblers don't support UTF-8 in
> identifiers (and I bet there are other non-gas assemblers that don't either).
>
Do w
10 matches
Mail list logo
