https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
> I think all are covered now.
Yes and no: while the test is now UNSUPPORTED on SPARC, it also became
UNSUPPORTED on x86 (both 32 and 64-bit) wher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b
commit r12-7978-gf6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
> b18489.d and ice21727.d were fixed in the last sync (r12-7414).
Good: I just saw that in last night's bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
b18489.d and ice21727.d were fixed in the last sync (r12-7414).
Only simd_ctfe.d is outstanding.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
