[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 Simon Sobisch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simonsobisch at gnu dot org --- Comment

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79c7ed9d45d1862fb1ac4e6f3653bf8892c3afe6 commit r15-10148-g79c7ed9d45d1862fb1ac4e6f3653bf8892c3afe6 Author: Rainer Orth

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9717324b7e867460f0e4023b12ad4a9d3633d889 commit r15-10140-g9717324b7e867460f0e4023b12ad4a9d3633d889 Author: James K. Lowd

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3dc4a5868132e80b9ab38469c170ea2a59142fb commit r15-10137-gf3dc4a5868132e80b9ab38469c170ea2a59142fb Author: James K. Lowd

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efc75cbe390a83dbf7bfe9d90dd16dfc030cead4 commit r15-10138-gefc75cbe390a83dbf7bfe9d90dd16dfc030cead4 Author: James K. Lowd

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e7dd06860bf0589bc743e458b16bd1d33d73835 commit r16-2192-g3e7dd06860bf0589bc743e458b16bd1d33d73835 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Fri

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #13 from James K. Lowden --- Please apply https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/687385.html, and thank you for the work.

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #11 from James K. Lowden --- > Please advise if this PR can be closed, or if not what flags to use as a > standard. There are more errors on 32-bit Darwin. I've posted

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #11 from James K. Lowden --- I would like to close this issue or fix what remains. It was reopened because it broke the bootstrap build, a lesson sorely learned. With the commit of June 20, that's been fixed. As of today, using a

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by James K. Lowden : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:007392c0f93cf46b9e87aebdd04e123e3381fc07 commit r16-1595-g007392c0f93cf46b9e87aebdd04e123e3381fc07 Author: James K. Lowden Date

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- > Is this fixed now? Not yet: there's still https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/687093.html (or rather a follow-up by James).

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Is this fixed now?

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by James K. Lowden : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14b8f077e4409ca0d188f0ed55891a18ba2ecd7d commit r16-1559-g14b8f077e4409ca0d188f0ed55891a18ba2ecd7d Author: James K. Lowden Date:

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61653 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61653&action=edit gcc16-pr120621.patch So, I think we want something like this patch + deal with the remaining 481 -Werror=forma

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, if cbldiag.h would want to avoid including the 3 gcc headers, it could perhaps #if (CHECKING_P && GCC_VERSION >= 4001) || GCC_VERSION == BUILDING_GCC_VERSION #define ATTRIBUTE_GCOBOL_DIAG(m, n) __attri

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by James K. Lowden : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f298fabf3f10bcc426b41c23f90a5b90d694730d commit r16-1531-gf298fabf3f10bcc426b41c23f90a5b90d694730d Author: James K. Lowden Date:

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-14 Status|UNCONFI