[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-07-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7305d78ab9478422ac03d17399e2384859a73c81 commit r15-10130-g7305d78ab9478422ac03d17399e2384859a73c81 Author: Robert Dubner

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-06-01 Thread rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-06-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:213cb633e7ec9b291768a4da0cd6d67679221aeb commit r16-1038-g213cb633e7ec9b291768a4da0cd6d67679221aeb Author: Robert Dubner Date: S

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-04-11 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-11 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-04-11 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|*-darwin* |*-darwin*, *-*-solaris* C

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-03-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Move it to the runtime is the only viable solution here.