[Bug classpath/20247] Lack java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue

--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 21:34 --- Checked in on the generics branch. Note that the VM requires changes for this code to work. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug classpath/20247] Lack java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue

--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-07 16:50 --- Yes, we can use most of these sources, just not all of them. I have a patch here which does it. And we already have stubbed declarations for most of the needed VM support. To finish we need: 1. A script which takes

[Bug classpath/20247] Lack java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue

--- Comment #6 from roman at kennke dot org 2006-04-07 11:11 --- whoops sorry, I missed the first couple of lines, which hopefully means that most of the code is indeed public domain: The software comprising JSR166 was written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 Expe

[Bug classpath/20247] Lack java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue

--- Comment #5 from roman at kennke dot org 2006-04-07 11:08 --- This is not really public domain: http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/readme?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup This code is covered by the nearly-but-not-exactly-free nuclear-bsd licens

[Bug classpath/20247] Lack java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue

--- Comment #4 from david at jpackage dot org 2006-04-07 10:56 --- FYI, the JSR 166 Concurrency Utilities sources are in the public domain. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20247

[Bug classpath/20247] Lack java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 23:08 --- Moving to classpath. -- What|Removed |Added Component|libgcj |