https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|11.3
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|11.2
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
> It needs to refer to the DW_TAG_formal_parameter DIEs, and only the PARM_DECLs
> map to those.
It has problem with the partitioning (if we call a callee from different
parititon) and also if the callee is co
> It needs to refer to the DW_TAG_formal_parameter DIEs, and only the PARM_DECLs
> map to those.
It has problem with the partitioning (if we call a callee from different
parititon) and also if the callee is compiled before caller (as it
should) we will call cgraph_node::release_body and that will l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, I comitted patch as is and we could see if any memory can be conserved by
being more precise. I still think the debug info should not need decls here.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f89dcf93348b44b8ea2b57f940fcdaeae0f764f6
commit r11-4648-gf89dcf93348b44b8ea2b57f940fcdaeae0f764f6
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Tue No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this patch fixes the ICE, though I think we do have a design issue here
while producing debug info across ltrans boundary.
Martin, Jakub: as discussed on IRC it would be nice to add predicate
when the body
Hi,
this patch fixes the ICE, though I think we do have a design issue here
while producing debug info across ltrans boundary.
Martin, Jakub: as discussed on IRC it would be nice to add predicate
when the body is really needed and avoid materializing if it is not.
Can you add one?
Something like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Here is a second simpler test case:
int a;
static void b(int c) {
if (a)
while (c)
b(0);
d();
}
void e(c) { b(c); }
void f() { e(0); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
14 matches
Mail list logo
