https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4)
> Does this patch fix the problem?
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551660.html
Yes, with that fix (as anticipated by you) build and boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 96541 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4)
> Does this patch fix the problem?
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551660.html
It looks like, still compiling. In the meantime I change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Does this patch fix the problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551660.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Just uncommenting the declarations doesn't help because later on compilation
fails with
n file included from gtype-desc.c:52:
../../gcc/value-range.h:352:21: error: 'm_ranges' is a private member of
'int_rang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Most likely this was that commit:
4ba9fb0a3e65 (Aldy Hernandez2020-07-30 11:30:18 +0200 150) template
friend void gt_ggc_mx (int_range *);
4ba9fb0a3e65 (Aldy Hernandez2020-07-30 11:30:18 +0200 151)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
It seems that the problem is in the declaration of the following variables in
value_range.h:
template friend void gt_ggc_mx (int_range *);
template friend void gt_pch_nx (int_range *);
template frien