https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
Thanks! I'm glad to see the new warning has helpe identify (and fix) a real
bug!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
All right, thanks for the clarification. Btw. qemu fixed the warning in the
meantime:
https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu/commit/4ce1e15fbc7266a108a7c77a3962644b3935346e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09f041390245da60411a9f0e08c4bedf7430585a
commit r10-7706-g09f041390245da60411a9f0e08c4bedf7430585a
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong bound in zero-length |[10 Regression] wrong bound
