https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vonchun at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alex_lop at walla dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
Anders Granlund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
GCC makes the integer type of the bit-field in question "unsigned:4".
See DR#315 (also, see the line of C90 DRs that led to the wording changes
in C99 relating to types of bit-fields, refe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is a TC rather than a DR which means it is not part of C11 but the next one.
