https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83108
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jon Levell from comment #3)
> I'm surprised this was closed invalid.
>
> "While the x86 architecture originally did not require aligned memory
> access, and still works without it, some SS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83108
--- Comment #3 from Jon Levell ---
I'm surprised this was closed invalid.
"While the x86 architecture originally did not require aligned memory access,
and still works without it, some SSE2 instructions on x86 CPUs do require the
data to be 128-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83108
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83108
--- Comment #1 from Jon Levell ---
Created attachment 42682
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42682&action=edit
Plain source file
