https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.5
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.4
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.2|10.3
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
Targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
I have checked list of my issues reported here and found Bug 68034 which is
closely related to this one. This patch probably will fix that one too, user
will know that his memset was removed by compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
--- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01493.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Right, const could be used in lieu of an "in" attribute for warnings. It can't
be used for the same thing for optimization because constness can be cast away.
Bug 10138 has a good discussion on the subject.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
"in" attribute is similar to "const", I am not sure if we need another one for
this.
"out" attribute would be handy. I recall than in the past I was looking for it.
gcc can print warning that uninitialize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
15 matches
Mail list logo