https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77328
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
The GCC 10 output looks almost correct. I think two things should change:
1) the warning should underline the directive (like the second note), not
the whole format string
2) the second note should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77328
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> GCC 8 and 9 output for the test case is slightly different (underlining the
> sprintf argument is a nice improvement) but still not what it should be:
>
> pr77328
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77328
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0
--- Comment #3 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77328
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77328
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
