https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 24 16:14:34 2016
New Revision: 236647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236647&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70434
PR c/69504
* c-c++-common/vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 24 07:55:56 2016
New Revision: 236630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-24 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/70434
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Better testcase:
typedef int U __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
int
foo (int i)
{
register U u asm ("xmm0");
return u[i];
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I think at some point the FEs created array-refs here. I think I suggested
that elsewhere during last stage1 but nobody implemented that ... (now it's
already again quite late).
Thus for vector[i] create
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
