https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Code that directly manipulates the representation of _Bool objects is
potentially buggy. GCC assumes that the representation is either all bits zero
(for false) or only the least significant bit is set (for t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
Pon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pponnuvel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from Pon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Jan 8 01:00:25 2016
New Revision: 232147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68966 - atomic_fetch_* on atomic_bool not diagnosed
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02075.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37077|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
