https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Of course, it's just about whether it's very important anymore. If it hasn't
happened by now, it probably won't. I nearly left a similar comment to pinskia.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> I am not sure if this needed any more since now () means the same as (void)
> with C23 and GCC defaults to C23 ...
Some people may still wish to compile for earl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am not sure if this needed any more since now () means the same as (void)
with C23 and GCC defaults to C23 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
--- Comment #5 from Chengnian Sun ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3)
> "has no parameters" does not mean "has a type that includes a prototype
> with no parameters". See DR#317.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
"has no parameters" does not mean "has a type that includes a prototype
with no parameters". See DR#317.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_317.htm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
Chengnian Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
