https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
__builtin_assoc_barrier is being implemented
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/578935.html That
should solve part of this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I wonder whether a very early pass splitting functions at FENV clobber
> points and preventing re-inlining would be a better solution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Or have a pass that automates your asm() barrier instrumentation for all values
that are life across a FENV affecting call.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > propagation, or replace x*-y with -x*y, or move operations across
> > fesetround,
>
> Do you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> propagation, or replace x*-y with -x*y, or move operations across fesetround,
Do you mean -(x*y)? I don't see the problem with replac
