https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58884
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58884
--- Comment #4 from Max TenEyck Woodbury ---
I think there is a misunderstanding here...
These patches, when I submit them, will add a new warning option. It is not
appropriate to add this to the normal "unused-value" warning because the
situat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58884
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Max TenEyck Woodbury from comment #1)
> > I found the relevant code in the "gimplify" modules.
>
> This is the wrong location for this kind of warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58884
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58884
Max TenEyck Woodbury changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c
--- Comment #1 from Max TenEyck
