https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at westcontrol dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> The above loop is not so obvious an infinite loop at all. Since f2 is not
> declared as pure/const, GCC can think the return value changes without the
> argume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> Derived from the current Linux kernel:
>
> // i never changes, so the code loops forever.
>
> extern int f2( int);
>
> void f1()
> {
> int i = 0;
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kuq03132 at qoika dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #4 from Tim Ruehsen 2012-07-10 07:58:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have thought a lot how to attract more and new developers to GCC who will be
> willing to develop things that are not a priority for current developers, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-07-09
13:59:58 UTC ---
(If
> I had time to to that, I wouldn't have put it on the wishlist but created a
> patch.)
I have thought a lot how to attract more and new developers to GCC who will be
willin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #2 from Tim Ruehsen 2012-07-09 11:50:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Obvious endless loops could be reported, e.g. if the loop condition doesn't
> > change and the loop can't be left otherwise.
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
11 matches
Mail list logo
