https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:136f364e26d9ad4f05e0005e480813cdc8f56c96
commit r15-2403-g136f364e26d9ad4f05e0005e480813cdc8f56c96
Author: Sam James
Date: Tue Jul 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Status|REOP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93f6a47583f3fa8a1b66856ecb19ec28f26b2ba4
commit r15-210-g93f6a47583f3fa8a1b66856ecb19ec28f26b2ba4
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon May 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6634a409124a884ff66b3756568a7daae7d3c295
commit r15-211-g6634a409124a884ff66b3756568a7daae7d3c295
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon May 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adb1c8a0f167c3a1f7593d75f5a10eb07a5d741a
commit r15-208-gadb1c8a0f167c3a1f7593d75f5a10eb07a5d741a
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon May 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f27fc59d9f7c735d200fda647a487850144b10eb
commit r15-209-gf27fc59d9f7c735d200fda647a487850144b10eb
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon May 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Clang has accept this extension:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84428
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #8 from Kees Cook ---
Clang bug: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/84565
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #7 from Kees Cook ---
There is still no way to use C99 flexible arrays in unions (or alone in
structs) without syntactic obfuscation. The extension that already allows
0-sized arrays in unions should be extended to cover C99 arrays. T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
Kees Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carlos at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
--- Comment #4 from Mike Frysinger ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
that's fine. thanks !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
Carlos O'Donell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carlos_odonell at mentor
16 matches
Mail list logo