https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6)
>> Certainly not: IRIX isn't PowerPC but MIPS!
>
> OK, that wasn't clear because th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6)
> Certainly not: IRIX isn't PowerPC but MIPS!
OK, that wasn't clear because the original but report mentioned:
"gcc.target/powerpc/rs6000-ldouble-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #4)
>> I can see the same problem under Linux (gcc110.fsffrance.org).
>
> In case this wasn't clear,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #4)
> I can see the same problem under Linux (gcc110.fsffrance.org).
In case this wasn't clear, the architecture is also a PowerPC. The
double-double format comes f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
I can see the same problem under Linux (gcc110.fsffrance.org).
According to the C standard (C99 and C11), the *_EPSILON values are "the
difference between 1 and the least value greater than 1 that is repres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-30 15:43:53 UTC ---
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-03-30 15:16:57 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 15:16:57 UTC ---
> Why do you think this is bogus? It's correct for IBM long double, where
> the mantissa bits can be discontiguous, and so the least value greater
> than 1 that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-29 18:50:47 UTC ---
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Running the testcase through g++ -g3 -save-temps, epsilon.ii reveals
>
> #define __FLT_EPSILON__ 1.192092895507812
