[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

2014-06-04 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

2014-06-04 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Jun 5 05:30:39 2014 New Revision: 211254 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211254&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/48062 * c-decl.c (warn_if_shadowing): Call inform instead o

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

2014-06-03 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

2012-02-13 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-13 17:25:11 UTC --- There is a patch in PR52116

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

2011-06-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-06-09 07:55:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Produces no warning. So for me it is a bit confusing, since the warning > setting > refers to pieces of code and not to variables. You are right and

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

2011-06-08 Thread momchil at xaxo dot eu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 momchil at xaxo dot eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||momchil at xaxo dot eu --- Commen

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

2011-03-10 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|