[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-03 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #15 from Frédéric Buclin 2010-10-03 13:09:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Frédéric, do you know what happened to the mangled URLs in this PR? Yes, this string has been linkified twice. First because the GCC extension detected

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||LpSolit at netscape dot net --- Comment

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-03 10:12:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > > Is this a bugzilla bug? It seems so, since I can make it happen again.

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-03 10:11:26 UTC --- The output of GCC is not designed to be parsed by IDEs: http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19165 nor is GCC designed to be tightly integrated with an IDE.

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-03 09:50:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > The output of GCC is not designed to be parsed by IDEs: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/��0�� As an aside, what happened to that URL? It looks fine here: http

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread g...@integrable-solutions.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #10 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02 22:35:12 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org >> > And you say that you have colored output but you don't want FSF GCC to >> > have it? >> > Am I misunderstanding you? >

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-02 19:46:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:04 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org he > environment.  How far should we go to emulate an IDE? > > > > So how does it work in openS

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread g...@integrable-solutions.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #8 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02 18:41:28 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:30 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 > > --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-02 > 18:30:

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread g...@integrable-solutions.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #7 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02 18:35:26 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:04 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org he environment.  How far should we go to emulate an IDE? > > So how does it work in openSUSE? Do they have patches that FSF G

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-02 18:30:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org > > IDEs let users get the colors they want -if they ever wanted. The output of GCC is not d

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-02 18:04:00 UTC --- > my copy of GCC (under openSUSE) colors the output and let me > customize the colors. That is quite system dependent. Getting > the same stuff under non-Unix like system requi

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread g...@integrable-solutions.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02 17:32:08 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org > Since gcc doesn't have caret or fix-it hints, my proposal is quite modest, > just >  color the diagnostic markers: > > er

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread g...@integrable-solutions.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #3 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02 17:30:05 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 > > Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: > >           What    |Removed

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

2010-10-02 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@integrable-solutions.ne