[Bug c/44420] [feature request] Warn for certain integer overflows

2010-06-07 Thread fm3 at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de
--- Comment #4 from fm3 at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de 2010-06-08 06:19 --- Yes, you are right. This is a duplicate. Thanks. -- fm3 at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/44420] [feature request] Warn for certain integer overflows

2010-06-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 17:53 --- I think it is a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42935 *** -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/44420] [feature request] Warn for certain integer overflows

2010-06-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 17:36 --- (In reply to comment #1) > uint64_t = uint32_t OP uint32_t; With an implicit casting to uint64_t? If that is the case this is a dup of bug 42935. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44420

[Bug c/44420] [feature request] Warn for certain integer overflows

2010-06-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 17:34 --- > foo = bar << 20; Yes this can overflow but so can "bar * 2" and "bar + 1". Maybe I am missing something here because we don't warn for those cases. Do you want a warning where the assignment happens to be a wid