https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #12 from R. Diez ---
*** Bug 77488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
R. Diez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdiezmail-gcc at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a9b3f04c11eb467a8dc504a37dad57a371a0d4c
commit r12-938-g1a9b3f04c11eb467a8dc504a37dad57a371a0d4c
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fuchedzhy at google dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please send patches to the gcc-patches mailing list for review. Patches in
bugzilla are easily overlooked or forgotten.
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #6 from Asier Llano 2012-08-31
08:03:58 UTC ---
We tried it in 4.7 and it works perfectly. By now we will have to apply this
patch for our development with 4.7.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Asier Llano changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asierllano at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
--- Comment #4 from cfriedt at visible-assets dot com 2010-04-30 09:54
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Please consider this patch. It adds support for obtaining file basename via
> __FILE_BASENAME__.
Please do!
What would also be really nice would be to have similar functionality for
--- Comment #3 from rmh dot gcc at aybabtu dot com 2010-01-02 11:39 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> __BASE_FILE__ could be enough for what you want.
Hi,
I tried already, but __BASE_FILE__ seems to be something unrelated. It's
like __FILE__ but when used in an #include'd source it picks
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-02 11:06 ---
__BASE_FILE__ could be enough for what you want.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #1 from rmh dot gcc at aybabtu dot com 2010-01-02 10:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=19445)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19445&action=view)
__FILE_BASENAME__
Attaching the patch. Also sent to gcc-patches.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
13 matches
Mail list logo