--- Comment #6 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 21:12 ---
Not a bug.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-14 12:01 ---
Subject: Re: spurious format string warnings
On Thu, 14 May 2009, bje at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
>
> "GCC can assume %qE means anything from just printing E in quotes"
>
> Can you explain th
--- Comment #4 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 01:01 ---
Andrew wrote:
"GCC can assume %qE means anything from just printing E in quotes"
Can you explain this? Is it really the case that the format specifier can have
an optional argument?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-08 10:19 ---
Subject: Re: spurious format string warnings
On Fri, 8 May 2009, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> is happening here, it is assuming %qE does not take an argument). I don't see
> an issue really except you
--- Comment #2 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-08 05:38 ---
I've been building cross-compilers for a long time and I have never heard that!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40065
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-08 05:22 ---
GCC can assume %qE means anything from just printing E in quotes (which is what
is happening here, it is assuming %qE does not take an argument). I don't see
an issue really except you really should be compiling a c
