--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 17:47 ---
Subject: Bug 39983
Author: hjl
Date: Wed May 6 17:45:40 2009
New Revision: 147195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147195
Log:
2009-05-06 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-0
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-03 19:57 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-03 19:57 ---
Subject: Bug 39983
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun May 3 19:57:32 2009
New Revision: 147083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147083
Log:
2009-05-03 Richard Guenther
PR c/39983
*
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-02 17:55 ---
Hm, it's rather that the fix for &a vs. &a[0] doesn't apply to constructor
elements. *sigh*
Re-visiting the "real" fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39983
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 21:13 ---
FE problem. In
extern const int b[1];
static const int * const c[] = { b };
b decays to type int * instead of const int *.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
