--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-13 04:06 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39451 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-03-13
03:58 ---
This regression is caused by r144812.
r144812 | vmakarov | 2009-03-12 10:39:55 -0400 (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) | 8 lines
2009-03-12 Vladi
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-03-13
01:27 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable
> I also see this fail.
Specifically, I see it in r144826.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-03-13
01:27 ---
Fails at both -m32 and -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-03-13
01:24 ---
Dave's last posted results without this is r144796.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-13 01:23 ---
I also see this fail.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-03-13
01:17 ---
Correction...the regression is observed on i686-apple-darwin9. I haven't
checked current gcc trunk under darwin10 yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450
