[Bug c/38387] [4.4 Regression] psim miscompiled

2009-01-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-19 23:29 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38587 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/38387] [4.4 Regression] psim miscompiled

2009-01-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-19 23:28 --- This isn't really fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/38387] [4.4 Regression] psim miscompiled

2008-12-10 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 17:13 --- My native compiler got updated as part of an RTEMS test sweep to: gcc (GCC) 4.4.0 20081209 (experimental) [trunk revision 142610] I can't reproduce this failure at all now. I am guessing this was the same as another

[Bug c/38387] [4.4 Regression] psim miscompiled

2008-12-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 15:03 --- A binary search between -O2 and -O0 compiled objects should be pretty quick. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38387

[Bug c/38387] [4.4 Regression] psim miscompiled

2008-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 23:31 --- Can you at least reduce this to a single source file of psim that is miscompiled and attach preprocessed source for that file (maybe even hinting which function is affected - if it happens to still miscompile with

[Bug c/38387] [4.4 Regression] psim miscompiled

2008-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|psim miscompiled|[4.4 Regression] psim |[regression]