http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36367
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 10:10
---
> Is it to ask for warn at the following test case?
Yes, it is. An additional condition could be that the type be non-void.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36367
--- Comment #4 from pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 09:19 ---
Sorry! I have misunderstood this issue before.
Is it to ask for warn at the following test case?
=
int foo (int a)
{
return a;
}
int bar (int c)
{
if (foo (1), c) // Warn foo(1) don't have obvi
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 10:08
---
Not clear what happened but the aforementioned commit is not a fix for this PR.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 09:58 ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu May 29 11:33:17 2008
New Revision: 136154
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136154
Log:
* tree-nested.c (check_for_nested_with_variably_modified): Fix typo.
Ad
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 12:00 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
