--- Comment #5 from regehr at cs dot utah dot edu 2008-03-29 19:32 ---
Subject: Re: apparent integer math bug
> wrapping behavior with signed types. Note the C standard is over 18
> years old now so I had hoped people would still not making the mistake
> of thinking signed interger
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-29 19:27 ---
Subject: Re: apparent integer math bug
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:16, "regehr at cs dot utah dot edu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from regehr at cs dot utah dot edu 2008-03
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:16, "regehr at cs dot utah dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #3 from regehr at cs dot utah dot edu 2008-03-29
19:16 ---
Subject: Re: apparent integer math bug
This multiplication overflows so the resulting behavior i
--- Comment #3 from regehr at cs dot utah dot edu 2008-03-29 19:16 ---
Subject: Re: apparent integer math bug
> This multiplication overflows so the resulting behavior is undefined.
Right-- but always in the past it has been (or seemed) fine to assume
two's complement overflow behavi
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 10:27 ---
use unsigned arithmetic.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-29 05:08 ---
Subject: Re: New: apparent integer math bug
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2008, at 21:40, "regehr at cs dot utah dot edu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> This is for "gcc (GCC) 4.3.0".
>
> This function returns dif
