--- Comment #10 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2008-02-14 23:15
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> We can't change the current behavior/ABI obviously. But the request for
> better
> documentation is correct.
>
Would it be feasibly to have a non-fatal testcase for this, so tha
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-14 23:04 ---
We can't change the current behavior/ABI obviously. But the request for better
documentation is correct.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2008-02-14 22:06
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Yes, so for packed structs (which are a GCCism), GCC sets the rule. Better
> documentation is certainly appreciated, but - what is the bug here? Did
> the behavior change (I think
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-14 21:33 ---
Yes, so for packed structs (which are a GCCism), GCC sets the rule. Better
documentation is certainly appreciated, but - what is the bug here? Did
the behavior change (I think it did for some 3.x releases) recently
--- Comment #6 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2007-11-02 16:58
---
>From the gcc internals
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Storage-Layout.html):
Target Hook: bool TARGET_MS_BITFIELD_LAYOUT_P (tree record_type)
This target hook returns true if bit-fields in the g
--- Comment #5 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2007-10-20 13:35
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > The standard puts all the burden on the implementation (See 6.7.2.1/10).
> > The GCC manual in turn says the behavior is specified by the ABI (4.9
> > St
--- Comment #4 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2007-10-20 12:55
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The standard puts all the burden on the implementation (See 6.7.2.1/10).
> The GCC manual in turn says the behavior is specified by the ABI (4.9
> Structures, unions, enumerations, a
--- Comment #3 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2007-10-20 12:20
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The standard puts all the burden on the implementation (See 6.7.2.1/10).
> The GCC manual in turn says the behavior is specified by the ABI (4.9
> Structures, unions, enumerations, a
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-20 09:47 ---
The standard puts all the burden on the implementation (See 6.7.2.1/10).
The GCC manual in turn says the behavior is specified by the ABI (4.9
Structures, unions, enumerations, and bit-fields), which would be the sys
--- Comment #1 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2007-10-20 01:49
---
Created an attachment (id=14374)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14374&action=view)
A complete testcase.
I compiled with gcc -ggdb3 file.c -o file, no optimization flags.
--
http://gc
10 matches
Mail list logo
