--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:33 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.3
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 26494
Author: manu
Date: Thu Feb 15 22:31:17 2007
New Revision: 122017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122017
Log:
2007-02-15 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-25 09:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 26494
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02068.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-24 19:10 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 26494
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02023.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #6 from truedfx at gentoo dot org 2007-01-23 00:23 ---
Thank you, and done.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26494
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 00:10 ---
Open a new bug report, please. I am going to submit a patch to fix this one and
reviewers don't like patches that do many things and the same time.
Add me to the CC list of the new report and I will look at it as soon
--- Comment #4 from truedfx at gentoo dot org 2007-01-23 00:08 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> -Wendif-labels and -Wimplicit-int don't turn errors into warnings, so
> probably,
> yes.
So probably, no, it does not happen with any other option. Sorry, I read your
question wrong.
--
h
--- Comment #3 from truedfx at gentoo dot org 2007-01-23 00:05 ---
-Wendif-labels and -Wimplicit-int don't turn errors into warnings, so probably,
yes. I did notice something else of interest while testing, though:
int main(char a) {}
gcc bug.c -ansi -pedantic
compiles this without any
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 23:47 ---
Does it happen with any other option apart from
-Wimplicit-function-declaration?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26494
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-28 12:59 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
10 matches
Mail list logo
