[Bug c/24137] __uint128_t missing for ppc32

2005-10-07 Thread janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #5 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-07 20:27 --- I bumped into this PR by accident and happen to have looked into this recently. __uint128_t is supported on a ppc64 system with a powerpc64-linux compiler using "-m32 -mpowerpc64". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c/24137] __uint128_t missing for ppc32

2005-09-29 Thread BKStrelioff at Hotmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From BKStrelioff at Hotmail dot com 2005-09-30 02:19 --- I still am not sure I agree, but I have read your post ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00514.html ) and since this appears to be an old issue I will go ahead and patch glibc for now. Again thanks f

[Bug c/24137] __uint128_t missing for ppc32

2005-09-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 02:16 --- This is a bug in glibc. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/24137] __uint128_t missing for ppc32

2005-09-29 Thread BKStrelioff at Hotmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From BKStrelioff at Hotmail dot com 2005-09-30 02:13 --- Thanks for the quick response, but I think this support should be in ppc32 compilers also. The altivec memory operations deal with 128-bit, 16-byte aligned values, and hence this support should be in ppc32

[Bug c/24137] __uint128_t missing for ppc32

2005-09-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 02:06 --- __uint128_t is only valid for 64bit targets. Otherwise you will get an ICE trying to use the type. -- What|Removed |Added --