--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 17:11 ---
Thanks for the report. FIXED in GCC 4.5
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 17:10 ---
Subject: Bug 20631
Author: manu
Date: Fri Feb 26 17:09:29 2010
New Revision: 157096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157096
Log:
2010-02-26 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c/20631
*
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-02-25 15:40 ---
Subject: Re: Support -std=c90 as alias for -std=c89
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Joseph, would you approve a patch for this?
Yes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 11:56 ---
Joseph, would you approve a patch for this?
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 02:08 ---
Do we really want this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20631
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-23
00:21 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From kst at mib dot org 2005-03-24 22:50 ---
> the correct way is:
> -std=iso9899:1990
Sure, but as long as "-std=c89" is supported, why not support "-std=c90"
as well? It's more correct than "c89", and it's easier to remember
than "iso9899:1990".
--
http://
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24
22:24 ---
the correct way is:
-std=iso9899:1990
--
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown
