--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 20:42
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This got fixed somehow. There is a testcase in the testsuite to make sure we
> do
> not regress.
This was most likely fixed by:
2008-09-17 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 18:28 ---
This got fixed somehow. There is a testcase in the testsuite to make sure we do
not regress.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 18:27 ---
Subject: Bug 12603
Author: manu
Date: Mon Oct 20 18:26:21 2008
New Revision: 141244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141244
Log:
2008-10-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 13:28 ---
No warning in GCC 4.4 with any of those:
-O0 -Wall -Wextra -Wreturn-type -Wunreachable-code
-O1 -Wall -Wextra -Wreturn-type -Wunreachable-code
-O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wreturn-type -Wunreachable-code
-O3 -Wall -Wextra -Wretu
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 19:30 ---
*** Bug 30794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---