https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266
--- Comment #16 from H. Peter Anvin ---
Well, if that is the way you feel about it. It is certainly different from the
messages we get in other situations, so it is a bit confusing to me.
It isn't *that* unusual that you know a priori that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #14)
> A bigger, philosophical question: we are always told that builtins are
> better for the compiler than inline assembly, as it gives the compiler more
> informa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266
H. Peter Anvin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RFE: builtins for N*N -> 2N |RFE: builtin 2N/N -> N