https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114816
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114816
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:338d687e2a32f4e152d26c02319db1cb00401c3f
commit r15-5576-g338d687e2a32f4e152d26c02319db1cb00401c3f
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114816
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
N3344 alternative 1 was accepted for C2Y. So we should make all these
questionable cases hard errors (no need for conditionals on standard version
since they were previously implicitly undefined behavior).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114816
--- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Note that it's not possible to define a function with such parameters ("After
adjustment, the parameters in a parameter type list in a function declarator
that is part of a definition of that function shal
