https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773
--- Comment #4 from Sirraide ---
Yeah, we figured that that was why they’re not supported in `-gnu89` mode, but
I thought I’d ask just to be sure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773
--- Comment #2 from Sirraide ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
Looks like it is on purpose:
C++0x raw strings are supported for C++ and for C with -std=gnu99.
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20080912132007.ga9...@hs2