https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109979
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The warning should happen for both ...
OK (as the documentation says "[...] that might overflow the destination
buffer).
(In reply to Richard Biener from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109979
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note there is no warning if you use -fwrapv which is what I expected as the
range of e-1 becomes the whole range because overflow becomes defined as
wrapping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109979
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|[12 Regre
