https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e02b8468be6b655c43c6d64fef772678681
commit r9-10139-g0e02b8468be6b655c43c6d64fef772678681
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a4db01ba8171e5f7b82cb5a36e0a6cbb6e996a0
commit r10-10693-g7a4db01ba8171e5f7b82cb5a36e0a6cbb6e996a0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddc0d2593fb4d2eb432e24018d36dd3f337a8138
commit r11-9726-gddc0d2593fb4d2eb432e24018d36dd3f337a8138
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d76511138dc816ef66fd16f71531f48c37dac3b4
commit r12-7557-gd76511138dc816ef66fd16f71531f48c37dac3b4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Arnd's request was to not have -Wshift-negative-value implied by -W, or at
least not if -fwrapv (-pedantic would be wrong btw, the standard does not
require a diagnostic here, and that is what -pedantic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
I agree that -fwrapv should make left-shift of positive values when the result
is not representable well-defined but I'm not sure about the negative value
case - the standard does not provide enough reasoni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 52522
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52522&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
... does NOT have a good enough balance ...
Sorry :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #1 from Andre
13 matches
Mail list logo