[Bug c++/89237] Partial specialization incorrectly marked as ambiguous with sizeof(T) narrowing down to bool

2024-01-23 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89237 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/89237] Partial specialization incorrectly marked as ambiguous

2021-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89237 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/89237] Partial specialization incorrectly marked as ambiguous

2021-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89237 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- ICC also rejects it with the same message as GCC even. MSVC rejects it with: (9): error C2794: 'type': is not a member of any direct or indirect base class of 'enable_if' (9): warning C4305: 'specialization'

[Bug c++/89237] Partial specialization incorrectly marked as ambiguous

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89237 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR