https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
Bug 87656 depends on bug 87729, which changed state.
Bug 87729 Summary: Please include -Woverloaded-virtual in -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
-Wmissing-declarations came up as a possibility for this in IRC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> Note, what is most important with this are configure scripts, if we start
> warning on something still widely used in configure snippets, we'll get
> silen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #12)
> The only reason to remove support for this is if it actually simplifies the
> compiler code itself, which means we have to completely not support it
> an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #11)
> -Wold-style-definition
>
> KnR style function definitions have been deprecated for about 35 years.
>
> Yes, there is a warning for it in gcc, but that warni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
Like bash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #11)
> -Wold-style-definition
>
> KnR style function definitions have been deprecated for about 35 years.
+1
> Yes, there is a warning for it in gcc, but tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
-Wold-style-definition
KnR style function definitions have been deprecated for about 35 years.
Yes, there is a warning for it in gcc, but that warning isn't in either
-Wall or -Wextra.
Also, switching
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> > Any reason not to put -Wnested-externs in -Wall or -Wextra?
>
> It warns for any "extern" declaration in ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> Any reason not to put -Wnested-externs in -Wall or -Wextra?
It warns for any "extern" declaration in other than file scope. This is
completely standard C,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
Any reason not to put -Wnested-externs in -Wall or -Wextra?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> I'd like to vote for -Wduplicated-cond being in either -Wextra or -Wall.
>
> I only just found it last week (thanks to Weverything discussion)
> and it is pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #5 from krux ---
I meant -Wshadow=local.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to krux from comment #3)
> -Wshadow, at least the local variant, would indeed be really nice in -Wall
> or at least -Wextra. The global one is still too noisy because of class
> constructors: https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
krux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hoganmeier at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
From: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DiagnosticsGuidelines
As a rough guideline, a warning option should be:
enabled by default if it has (almost) no false positives (e.g.,
-Woverflow);
added to -W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
20 matches
Mail list logo
