--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 16:33 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.4.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 16:19 ---
Subject: Bug 8715
Author: manu
Date: Wed Aug 6 16:17:41 2008
New Revision: 138814
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138814
Log:
2008-08-06 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR 87
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 15:33 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I meant that the warning is appropriate but
> > the message is confusing because it is exposing that when doing
> >
> > bool x = ~b;
> >
> > we actually do
>
--- Comment #9 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 17:03
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I meant that the warning is appropriate but
> the message is confusing because it is exposing that when doing
>
> bool x = ~b;
>
> we actually do
>
> bool x = (~b != 0);
>
Or, more
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 16:56 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > OK. I see now. This seems hard to fix, since it is exposing the current
> > implementation of a conversion to bool.
> >
>
> No, it's not the 'current implementat
--- Comment #7 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 16:46
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> OK. I see now. This seems hard to fix, since it is exposing the current
> implementation of a conversion to bool.
>
No, it's not the 'current implementation', its the way the C and C++
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 16:00 ---
OK. I see now. This seems hard to fix, since it is exposing the current
implementation of a conversion to bool.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8715
