https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Because it's not non-standard, inline namespaces are standard.
That means the compiler already supports them, and will continue to do so.
Supporting a different (inferior) way to achieve something similar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624
--- Comment #3 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
As you noted, --pedantic-errors makes that code an error, so it is not an
equivalent replacement.
Also, GNU-specific attributes can and often are supported by other compilers.
When they are not, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to andysem from comment #0)
> The problem with this warning is that it suggests using inline namespaces
> instead, but that is not an option on C++03 code base. The attribute is used
> precisely t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624
--- Comment #1 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
Created attachment 42983
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42983&action=edit
Test code to reproduce the warning
I've attached a repro test case. Compile with:
g++ -std=gnu++03 -o
