https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 13 19:31:14 2017
New Revision: 245401
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245401&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79232
* typeck.c (cp_build_modify_expr): Handle pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40607|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40607
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40607&action=edit
gcc7-pr79232.patch
This patch (totally untested) implements it and fixes the ICE with both the
original reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though the #c1 testcase actually tests something even different (the #c5
questions apply otherwise), because there is the [d], therefore it really
should be evaluated in the order: side-effects in e, side-eff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On the C++, the question really is what C++17 wants with comma expression on
the lhs used as lvalue and what should be done for C++14 and earlier.
Shouldn't COMPOUND_EXPR be handled like before for
-fstrong-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
