[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|error-recovery |diagnostic --- Comment #6 from Jonatha

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jim Michaels from comment #2) > I don't believe this answer. > to my knowledge the syntax is OK for c++11. Please stop claiming templates don't work and learn to write C++. > I was even told

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- part makes this code invalid. Basically you are not specializing a template but just declaring one.

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 --- Comment #3 from Jim Michaels --- oh, and the error messages do not fit the problem.

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 --- Comment #2 from Jim Michaels --- I don't believe this answer. to my knowledge the syntax is OK for c++11. I was even told once that is not needed, which was wrong. you did not state exactly what was wrong, only that "your code is wrong." ple

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|