[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2017-11-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2017-10-23 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Oct 23 19:06:37 2017 New Revision: 254022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254022&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/77369 - wrong noexcept handling in C++14 and below

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2017-10-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2017-10-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-04-24 00:00:00 |2017-10-17 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2017-02-15 Thread m...@daniel-boehmer.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Daniel Böhmer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@daniel-boehmer.net --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2016-08-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Richard Smith realized that it uses the noexceptness of the first type it's instantiated with, because if you reverse the order of the calls, it produces false, false

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2016-08-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|